Can the green bond market enter a new era under the fluctuation of oil price?

This paper investigates how oil price (OP) influences the prospects of green bonds by utilising the quantile-onquantile (QQ) method and researching the interactions between OP and green bond index (GBI) from 2011:M1 to 2021:M11. We find that impacts from OP on the GBI are positive in the short run. The positive effects indicate that high OP can promote the development of the green bond market, indicating that green bonds can be considered an asset to avoid OP shocks. However, in the medium and long term, there is a negative impact due to the oversupply of the oil market and the increase in green energy industry profits. These results are identical to the supply and demand-based correlation model of green bonds and oil price, which underlines a specific effect of OP on GBI. The GBI effect on OP is consistently positive across all quantiles. It indicates that green bonds cannot be considered efficient measures to alleviate the oil crisis due to the instability of the Middle East COVID-19 and the small scale of green bonds. The issuers of green bonds can make decisions based on OP. Understanding the relationship between OP and GBI is also beneficial for investors.

Reports of clinical trial protocols of coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review

Background: To examine the outcomes heterogeneity of clinical trial protocols of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to prioritize the establishment of a core outcome set. Methods: Databases of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors - accepted clinical trial registry platforms were searched on February 14, 2020 and May 31, 2020. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 were considered. Patient condition was classified as common, severe, or critical. Interventions included traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine. We excluded trials that involved discharged patients, psychological intervention, and complications of COVID-19. The general information and outcomes, outcome measurement instruments, and measurement times were extracted. The results were analyzed by descriptive analysis. Results: In all, 19 registry platforms were searched. A total of 97 protocols were selected from among 160 protocols for the first search. For protocols of traditional Chinese medicine clinical trials, 76 outcomes from 16 outcome domains were reported, and almost half (34/76, 44.74%) of the outcomes were reported only once;the most frequently reported outcome was time taken for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA to become negative. Twenty-seven (27/76, 35.53%) outcomes provided one or more outcome measurement instruments. Ten outcomes provided one or more measurement time frame. For protocols of Western medicine clinical trials, 126 outcomes from 17 outcome domains were reported;almost half (62/126, 49.21%) of the outcomes were reported only once;the most frequently reported outcome was proportion of patients with negative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Twenty-seven outcomes provided one or more outcome measurement instruments. Forty (40/126, 31.75%) outcomes provided one or more measurement time frame. There were > 40 duplicated outcomes between the clinical trials protocols of traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine protocols. All of them were included in the Delphi survey when developing core outcome set for COVID-19. A total of 1,027 protocols were selected from 2,741 protocols for the second search. Forty-two new outcomes and 47 new outcome measurement instruments were reported. Conclusion: Outcome reporting in clinical trial protocols of COVID-19 is inconsistent. Thus, establishing a core outcome set is necessary for diagnosis and management.

[Enlightment of routine vaccination under the prevention and control of COVID-19 based on the circulating event of type â ¢ vaccine-derived poliovirus in Shanghai].

Since the Global Polio Eradication Initiative was launched by the World Health Assembly in 1988, significant progress has been made in global polio prevention and control. But the occurrence of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis cases and vaccine-derived poliovirus related cases have become a major challenge during the post-polio era. While coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) has brought serious disease burden and economic burden to all countries in the world, prevention and control of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases such as polio should not be neglected under the background of the global common fight against COVID-19. Taking the type Ⅲ VDPV cycle event in Shanghai as an example, the paper discussed how to do a good job of routine inoculation under the prevention and control of COVID-19 to strictly prevent the outbreak of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases.

[Preliminary study of the antibody level in confirmed patients with COVID-19 after discharge].

Objective: To analyze the antibody levels and dynamic changes in patients infected with 2019-novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV). Methods: The average age of 72 corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients was (45.53±16.74)years(median age:47 year), including (44.88±17.09) years(median age:46 year) for 38 males and (46.32±16.52)years (median age:46 year) for 34 females in Loudi City, Hunan Province. There is no significant difference in genders between the severe and mild groups (χ²=0.916, P>0.05). There is a significant difference in the age between the severe and mild groups (F=3.315, P<0.05). The blood samples of 72 discharged patients were collected and the consistence of IgM and IgG antibodies were detected by chemiluminescence method. SPSS25.0 was used for gender, age, case type and antibody analysis of variance, χ2 test and other analysis. Results: The average time of the serum samples collection of 72 patients was (34.89±9.02)days (median time: 34 days) from onset of COVID-19, and (14.53±8.35) days (median time: 14 days) from discharge. The positive rate of IgM or IgG was 97.22% (70/72), and the positive rate of IgM and IgG was 48.61% (35/72) and 97.22% (70/72) respectively. Serum COVID-19 antibodies were detected in 72 patients from 1st to 40th days after discharge. The average concentration of IgM in 1-7 days, 8-14 days, 15-21 days, 22-28 days, above 29 days were 21.91(7.07-52.84)AU/ml, 14.16(6.19-32.88)AU/ml, 11.36(6.65-42.15)AU/ml, 8.15(3.66-30.12)AU/ml, 2.98(0.46-6.37)AU/ml. There was no significant difference in the time of IgM antibody concentration (H= 8.439, P>0.05). The average concentrations of IgG in 1-7 days, 8-14 days, 15-21 days, 22-28 days, 29 days and above were 169.90 (92.06-190.91) AU/ml, 163.89 (91.19-208.02) AU/ml, 173.31 (95.06-191.28) AU/ml, 122.84 (103.19-188.34) AU/ml, 101.98 (43.75-175.30) AU/ml, respectively, (H=2.232, P>0.05). The IgM becomes negative after the 3rd week of discharge and decreases rapidly with time. The IgG concentration higher than IgM during the same period, and keep at high level without any change, and decrease in the fourth week. Among them, 5 cases developed "re-infection" within 1-3 weeks after discharge, and the rate of "re-infection" was 6.94% (5/72 cases). Conclusions: After the COVID-19 patients are discharged from the hospital, the level of antibodies produced varies greatly among individuals, but the overall changes in antibodies have a certain pattern. It is recommended to strengthen the antibody monitoring during hospitalization and after discharge from the hospital to reduce the "re-infection" rate and potential risk of infection.